יום ראשון, 21 באוקטובר 2012

Outrageous claims

Minister of Foreign Affairs of the European Union, "Catherine Ashton" audacity allows herself if universal hypocrisy in all its splendor say Israel's plan to build 800 housing units "Gilo" in Jerusalem are illegal under international law "automatic condemnations" indicate lack of fundamental understanding of reality area, in such slogans she thinks to win? "Gilo" is an integral part of Jerusalem, and Jerusalem is an integral part of Israel. Anyone who wants to contribute to reaching an agreement should focus on preventing acts anti - Israel of the Palestinians in the inter – national. A concern for human rights softness of the Foreign Minister of the European Union what is happening in Syria and Lebanon. Very puzzling at the Middle East on fire, tens of thousands of civilians killed in Syria, and the Lebanese capital explode car bombs, Iran continues to pursue nuclear weapons - it bothers the honorable minister is the construction in Gilo in Jerusalem. Posts like these make the union irrelevant - the denunciations were heard from the mouth of the Foreign Minister of the EU do not contribute anything to promote dialogue between Israel and the Palestinians, but only encourage the Palestinians continue to refuse to negotiate - and providing honest, when everything is on the table - and keep in anti - Israel "in the international arena." On the EU to focus on problems that arise between peoples and nations in Europe - not to interfere the internal matter of the State of Israel. And stop exploiting the international stage political interests. Incessant attacks of rockets and scrape the southern communities of Sderot and its environs and light anemic response of the EU and Ashton's impotence - which gives security of the Hamas and their offshoots continue on this path. Among other things, there seems no great enthusiasm by Europe activity actual, physical, as opposed to talking and international conferences. The Israeli government has the right, duty and unequivocal commitment to protect its citizens, the cities, children and assets.
Conducted extensive legal battle against Israel also open war on terror. This campaign, run by organizations other than Parliamentary various UN agencies and local courts, was known as' Law-Fare ', ie' Law War "nickname:" Palestine "is now used to describe a people, a country and a country belonging to Arab residents of Israel. However, this is new and most old as the State of Israel, if not less. Oslo Accords Damned: Israel pledged to transfer to the Palestinian Authority Judea and Samaria stages, including state lands where, but remember that everything is designed to create the conditions for its ripening of negotiations on final status is determined that the results of the final settlement will not be affected by anything in this Agreement, and the parties shall be deemed to have given up any of the rights or claims they are claiming. Regarding Governing Law Judea and Samaria is Jordanian law determines in part the land not belonging to any person or non-cultivated by people belonging to state ownership. Law and Director of the State of Israel have been applied in Greater Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. Jerusalem was reunited following the Six Day War, the IDF took control of East Jerusalem and handed it to control Jordanian to Israeli control. Shortly after the area was annexed to Israel by order of Minister in accordance with Article 11 of the Ordinance on Law and Administration. Areas of the territories are under Israeli control under the Six-Day War in 1967. The prevailing view is that, under international law, these territories are "occupied territories" and Israel may hold them subject to the rules of the Fourth Geneva Convention. At the end of 1967 accepted the UN decision relating to these areas, this is a UN Security Council resolution numbered 242. Decision no teeth for two reasons. Firstly - the decision is based on Chapter 6 of the UN Charter, which deals with peaceful conflict settlement. Therefore, there is no way to enforce this decision. Second, the decision applies only to recognized states were relevant to the conflict when making the decision, not the organizations. More should be noted that this decision does not state that there must be a retreat to the borders of June 4, 67, but only supports the principle of withdrawal of Israeli armed forces "from territories occupied in the recent conflict." And has made it clear that the drafters of the resolution, "Surfaces" and not "all territories". "Occupied territories": First've never taken a foreign sovereign, so it is not an occupation. Second: "67 lines" international agreements were armistice lines. It also states that they will never be considered as a political or political boundary. Moreover, international law says that Israel was established without an international border. The only international border that Israel is familiar with Jordan and Egypt, following the signing of a "peace treaty." Which means that the situation is six days of fighting breaking of a "peace", and IDF forces crossed the fence to the West - not broke a recognized border. Interest of the State of Israel: its basic territory undetermined war, but as a result of decisions of the Great Powers, " At the San - Remo, 1920, "to give Britain the government of the Land of Israel power of attorney which is included in the" Balfour Declaration. "According to the decision, the United Kingdom will be responsible for fulfilling the declaration in favor of the establishment of" a national home for the Jewish people - Israel. "Mandate also included Transjordan's been stolen from us and separated in 1922, when it became emirate of Transjordan "split later to Iraq and Jordan. yet Transjordan west - left setting mandatory as part of a national home for the Jewish people. In other words, the areas that" sheep "of Israel in the Six Day War are actually areas issued by the British during the implementation of its mandate., and legally removing these areas strengthens the national home of the Jewish people act the British government during the period of its mandate here was an arbitrary decision, not backed ratification of international institutions." The smell of the great hypocrisy "comes from the understanding that it is based decision 242. Many countries increased their well pickled by the occupation of other countries through war, the United States captured 40% of the territory of Mexico (1846), France annexed Alsace - Lorraine from Germany, during World War The first, and further expanded its borders at the expense of Italy, and more. Therefore: Decisions Conference San - Remo not impaired in establishing the United Nations. Vice versa. Validity expressly preserved under Article 80 of the UN Charter. Even the UN partition plan of 1947, did not affect this right. Both because it was rejected by the Arab world, basically leaving the war at the end of the British Mandate, and because the program was only a            recommendation, without any binding force. And hence the right of Jewish settlement ill "anchored by rules of international law.                                          
Is there a deed of settlement in the West Bank constitute a violation of the Geneva Convention? Clear that this claim is nothing. Geneva Convention applies only to areas designated as "occupied territories" under international law., And areas of Judea and Samaria is not like that. "Geneva Convention": applies only to the actions of one state in another state. Country - Israel Bank is an area of ​​another country, but part of the British Mandate still not delivered any country, so how can the Convention apply to the Jews that they have the right of settlement in those areas according to international law expressly protected in Article 80 of the UN Charter? I appreciate that the work did not end there will be difficulties in the way - Please note: thirty-five years the UN has become the Arab majority the ongoing farce decisions. And with all this grief, our right to examine the decisions, as tested decision that Zionism is racism. Most UN members were happy to wipe Israel. But that does not make the decision to trial "More and more correct.  

אין תגובות:

הוסף רשומת תגובה