STINGING FAILURE

Alpha

Almost obsessive preoccupation of all media in the U.S., especially those associated with the right side of the political spectrum, the burning issue of the murder of four diplomats in Benghazi get more volume. Reports of the electronic media and the American print time and stress of particular interest for innovative information this painful issue - After all this is a very sensitive issue yet. turned ambassador complained in recent months about the inadequate security at the consulate in Benghazi, in particular complained about the escalating violence among militia Islamic Libya, correspondence, e-mail first exposed to media Reuters administration officials while the attack was in full swing - undermining the government's claim that Real-time knowledge of the murder of Ambassador Benghazi and undermine the claim that it was the result tantrum popular because the tape mocked the Prophet Muhammad. recalled administration argued back and forth for two weeks after the tragic incident that is not designed to attack UN ambassador was able to do interviews Susan Rice TV networks the United States immediately after the attack that the violence grew out of a spontaneous demonstration - documents indicate clearly that make the White House and State Department have been updated in Benghazi terror attack that occurred two hours after the radical Islamic organization claimed responsibility called "Ansar al - Sharia". The claim of the president of "Al Qaeda" have no basis for Hobbes is still alive and kicking. In contrast: Mitt Romney campaign says that despite the Obama administration's claims, the threat from Al Qaeda did not decrease significantly, despite the death of Osama bin Laden, the Islamic fundamentalist terrorism has not disappeared, there are still radical groups intended to kill Americans. Organizational Islamic extremists constitute a threat in North Africa and the Arabian Peninsula, this same pattern of terrorists who attacked the U.S. on September 11, 2001 the Obama administration has an urgent obligation to inform the public the truth, lacked adequate security even before the tragic event, and certainly During the attack, the terrible and deadly. despite warning signs many of the area immediately remains stable and is under threat, there were no ground troops Zminiim support team embassy in Benghazi, intelligence picture is poor, and outside help will not come even though she is not clear why not submitted in real time. claim sounds authorities did not give authorization is ridiculous - Is raid on the estate and makes bold assassination of the leader of al - Qaeda, Osama Bin - Laden received permission from the authorities in Islamabad, a U.S. or actions often acted out in the sovereign territory of Pakistan is the army getting pre-approved? ?? (According to published reports lazy, it turns out that was enough time to help at least approximately seven hours for the embassy to help was slow to arrive and therefore they found the tragic death) now heard all sorts of excuses from the government common sense can not get them on the stinging failure. No doubt there is a connection to the campaign, as the issue of the attack Benghazi and the administration's handling of the matter at the center of the first two confrontations.Recently conducted a comprehensive investigation on Capitol Hill Exploration attack U.S. consulate in Libya led to the death of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other foreign service of the United States. Since the attack Benghazi, we sounded conflicting reports coming out of the White House on what led to the attack. Requirement of Republicans know the truth, and if given proper security requirement embassy in Libya and Democrats on Capitol Hill leaders that the truth will out. because it carries critical national interests and security of the United States and will be investigated thoroughly. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney and other leaders questioning whether the White House responded to requests for more security before the attack. On the other hand argue that the Democrats: the investigation becomes a "witch hunt" to gain points in the presidential election

האווירה היא תרום בחירות

אנו עומדים בפני שתי מערכות-בחירות בשלושת החודשים הבאים – אחת בארצות-הברית ואחת בארץ. מבחינות רבות, שתי מערכות-הבחירות שונות מאוד זו מזו. אבל מבחינות אחרות, הן מאוד דומות זו לזו. ההבדל העיקרי בין שתי מערכות-הבחירות דומה להבדל בין שתי השיטות הפוליטיות. השאלה המתבקשת: איזו מהשתיים מהותית יותר לחיינו?

האווירה היא טרום בחירות הממשלה הנוכחית שוברת שיא של אריכות ימים. לגיל המופלג שלה. גיל הממשלה היוצאת כמעט בת ארבע ניתן לדמות אותה לאדם שמגיע לשיבא טובה, צעיר יכול להתאושש במהירות גם ממחלה קשה. אצל אדם המתקרב לגיל מופלג, נזלת קלה עלולה להתפתח לדלקת ריאות סופנית והסוף ידוע. לכן בניגוד לסטטיסטיקה, להערכות, ולתקדימים הרבים –רה"מ ממשיך לתפקד. כל קודמיו או שהם בבתי אבות, או בעולם שכולו טוב, או לכל הפחות ספונים בבתיהם. בחלוף כמעט ארבע שניים הממשלה החזיקה מעמד מבלי שתיגרר לוויתורים מדיניים, שמרה על הרכבה הקואליציוני, ובניגוד לקודמתה לא הפסידה באף הצבעה במליאת הכנסת. זהו ניהול מחושב היטב של הקואליציה, או אם תרצו - מחדל מתמשך של האופוזיציה. ליתר דיוק, שילוב בין השניים.

ישנן סיבות רבות שהביאו להחלשת כוחן של שתי המפלגות הגדולות. עם השנים נוספו שסעים בחברה הישראלית והפכו קשים יותר לפתרון, כדוגמת הסכסוך הישראלי-פלסטיני או יחסי דתיים-חילוניים. מה שגרם לעלייתן של מפלגות חדשות רבות שרובם נמצאות בגוש מרכז שמאל, שכל אחת במצע שלה וביעדה מכוונת לבעיה שונה או פלג אחר בחברה הישראלית.

רבים מהפרשנים הפוליטיים טועים בהתייחסותם לפלגים השונים שמשמאל לליכוד כאל גוש מרכז/שמאל: הם אינם גוש, אלא אוסף של פלגים אנוכיים שטרם הוכיחו את כישוריהם, והם אינם מרכז, כי משבצת המרכז תפוסה על-ידי הליכוד אכן כן במיומנות רבה. לכן הם שמאל, לפחות במובן המדיני. הגוש הקרוי ע"י הפרשנים "מרכז השמאל" ממשיך לפצל עצמו לדעת שהיה צפוף במילא עוד לפני ההכרזה על בחירות -מיעוט הקולות מרכז -שמאל נובע קודם כל מירידה משמעותית (באחוזים) של המצביעים לגוש הזה. למרות האמירות הפופוסוציאליסטיות של ח"כ שלי יחימוביץ'. אין מה לדאוג. יש דברים שבהם לא ניתן להחזיר את הגלגל לאחור, נכון מפלגתה עולה בסקרים הגורם לכך: היא פשוט נמנעה מכל דיבור על השלום. לעומת זאת הביעה אהדה למתנחלים ולחרדים, ומתייחסת לכיבוש הגדה המערבית במלחמת ששת הימים כאל עובדה קיימת. כאשר לוחצים עליה, היא אומרת שהיא תומכת בפתרון שתי-המדינות, אך נובע מדבריה שזהו חלום אוטופי שאינו מעניין אותה במיוחד. ובנוסף: מפלגת העבודה ברשות היו"ר יחימוביץ  חוזרת לחיזור האינטנסיבי אחר הערים האדומות שנותנות לה חיבוק דב, ומפנה עורף לקיבוצים, מושבים וערי הפריפריה.

בעבר טען השמאל שהוא נושא בשני דגלים – דגל השלום והדגל החברתי. עכשיו יש לנו שני "שמאל"ים: שמאל הנושא את דגל השלום בלי צדק חברתי, ושמאל הנושא את הדגל החברתי בלי שלום. צריך לחזור למפלגות הפוליטיים המסורתיים, ולא להיכנע לכל מיני מלוקקים שמבטיחים לנו פוליטיקה אחרת כאשר בפועל אין להם שום יכולת לספק את הסחורה. העיתונות נותנת במה להתקפות שלוחות רסן כלפי מפלגות שמייצגות את רוב הציבור. מי החליט שהמרכז חובר אל השמאל באידאולוגיה? באותה המידה הוא יכול לחבור אל הימין. משום מה, כולם מחברים את המרכז באופן אוטומטי אל השמאל, בעוד שיש מצביעים רבים שנוטים מהמרכז ימינה דווקא. רק אנשים שטחיים, או אכולי שנאת האחר יכולים להצביע לאחד מהמפלגות האלה הצצות כפטריות לאחר הגשם. לעומת זאת: אין ריבוי מפלגות בצד של המפה הפוליטית המזוהה כימינה מהמרכז, ולגוש הזה לא התווספה מפלגה חדשה משמעותית שמפרה את האיזון בגוש( דרעי ירד מהפרק להקים מפלגה חדשה) מדובר על חמש מפלגות בלבד, לעומת יותר מ-10 מפלגות בגוש שכנגד ועוד היד נטויה. הליכוד יוכל להרכיב בקלות מפלגות הימין ממשלה גם ללא מפלגות מרכז או שמאל כלשהן- הקרב האמיתי אינו בין מפלגות, אלא בין גושים. האם השמאל (המתקרא עכשיו "מרכז-שמאל") מסוגל להגיע למספר הקסום של 61? התשובה לכך: כל המפלגות הרצות בגוש מרכז שמאל, אפילו תאוחדנה בשם מפלגת "מרכז שמאל" אינן יכולות להרכיב ממשלה. אם לא תהיה התערבות של כח עליון, שתהפוך את כל הפוליטיקאים מהשמאל ומהמרכז לאנשים הדבקים בכל מחיר באידיאולוגיה שלהם, במצעם ובהבטחותיהם - אין שום סיבה להניח שגורמי מרכז או שמאל יהוו גורם מכריע או אפילו משפיע משמעותית בממשלה הבאה לאחר הבחירות. יתכן וחלקם כנראה יהיה בקואליציה בכל מקרה מאחר והם מעדיפים הנאה ממנעמי השלטון. המסר בקמפיין הליכוד היה ויהי "חזק בביטחון וחזק בכלכלה", ערכים שמשויכים לרה"מ כמותג הפוליטי המוביל. לא הייתי מהמר על האימרה: "לצעוד בנפרד, להכות ביחד." לגבי גוש מרכז שמאל. הסיכויים בקזינו "במונטה קרלו" נראים טובים יותר.

מסתמן שח"כ, ויו"ר קדימה לשעבר "ציפי ליבני" מגבשת את האפשרות להציג בפני הציבור סיעה עצמאית שתתמודד בבחירות הקרובות- וכנראה לא תעמוד בראש אחת הסיעות הקימות. כמו כן שוחחה עם ח"כ לשעבר אברהם פורז ובדקה את האפשרות כי תעשה שימוש במפלגתו הקיימת לצורך הבחירות ובתוך כך גם תשלב אותו ברשימה. ולעומת זאת מפלגת קדימה סופרת את ימיה- ח"כ רוחמה אברהם שנחשבת לאחת הדמויות הבולטות במפלגה קדימה הודיעה ליו"ר המפלגה שאול מופז שהיה פורשת ולא תרוץ לכנסת הבאה-עזיבתה כמו עוד בכירים במפלגה שהלכו באותה דרך מהווה מכה קשה למפלגה, שעל פי הסקרים צפויה לאבד את רוב כוחה. בתקופה האחרונה הודיעו כמה חברי כנסת על עזיבתם את המפלגה, האחרון שבהם היה ח"כ אריה ביבי. במצב העניינים שלפנינו הוועדה המסדרת שצפויה לקום בקרוב בקדימה ולהרכיב את הרשימה לכנסת, סיכוייה להיקלע לחוסר מעש גוברים.

ולכל זה יש להוסיף את אוכלוסיית האזרחים הוותיקים שמונה כ-750 אלף אזרחים. כאשר תוחלת החיים בישראל היא מהגבוהות בעולם. אוכלוסייה זו גדלה בקצב המהיר ביותר במדינה, הגמלאים ובני משפחותיהם הם כוח אלקטורלי גדול, אבל במיקח והממכר הקואליציוני לא ממש מתחשבים בהם . בעת ההכרזה על מפלגת הגמלאים בסיבוב הקודם, מרבית כוחה האלקטורלי הגיע מהגוש מרכז שמאל. לכן גם הפעם אין סיבה שזה ישתנה. הצהרותיו של יו"ר קדימה בימים ההם "אהוד אולמרט" "בבחירות האלו כבר ניצחנו" נתנה לגיטימציה להצבעה למפלגות קטנות. הגמלאים הגיעו להישגים בגלל סקטוריאליות, זעקתם של הקשישים היתה אחד הנושאים החברתיים העיקריים שהועלו על סדר היום על ידי מפלגת העבודה אולם לא רק על ידה. הנטישה ממפלגת העבודה גרמה לכך שהנציג האוטנטי מספר 1 של הגמלאים ולשעבר ממקימי מפלגת הגמלאים – "גדעון בן ישראל" נידחק למקום לא ריאלי. הנזק הישיר למפלגת העבודה לו מפלגת הנמלאים לא היתה נהפכת לאופנה וסחף קולות יתכן ולמפלגת העבודה היו ברשותה הרבה יותר מנדטים. לפי הסקר של אותם ימים – רק 44% ממצביעי מפלגה העבודה ב2003 הצביעו עבורה ב- 2006, זליגה של 10.26 מנדטים היא גבוהה מאוד. 3 מנדים הלכו למפלגת הגמלאים, והשאר למפלגת קדימה. 

Finis line in Sight

Alpha

A group of non-partisan voters and the undecided American public very pessimistic about the economic situation. This word, which is to characterize the election of 2012 when it comes to the U.S. economy and, more important when it comes to personal economic situation of citizens. While busy political commentators speculate American citizen looking for four years with growing concern about what lay in store for them the economic situation. I do not remember when there was pessimism so deeply about the economy and about personal situation of the American citizen. presidential elections characterized the campaign tiring and busy attacks negative voltage on both staffs peak candidates raise gear and stop appearing in front of an audience, especially in swinging - beads of sweat already appear on the foreheads of the two candidates U.S. presidential race arduous, getting them warm, but they continue to run. Sore muscles, but comfort finish line was in sight. The die almost fell Therefore it is natural, it is not easy. 55% of Americans think President Obama is not elected for a second term, and only 58% of Democrats think he will be elected again. It's because of mounting economic difficulties of the United States. Did situation would not at all sure - and so to the picture will have to wait another whole data in the U.S. economy, which could pose a serious problem to the Obama administration in critical areas that affect the American economy voter U.S.. (index growth rate and the unemployment index) because in the short term does not expect significant improvement, and this figure makes it difficult to return to a consistent and stable path of economic recovery and this can be very bad for the incumbent. Democratic camp Authority President Obama is still in place requiring any point to try and win the race and the second term for the White House, any loss in swinging about President Obama finally almost eliminate the chance of survival. However as its candidate Republican Mitt Romney - Riding the waves crushing victory first confrontation absolute knockout proved beyond all doubt that the job market is still the Achilles heel of the U.S. economy. It should be added: the growing dependence of the United States foreign capital to finance public consumption and its excesses, this topic is hard to recall an economic empire of attraction exist long after it had become so dependent on loans from outside. And an additional factor: the United States is infected what should be called a disorder, concentration and attention. Between the White House to Capitol Hill there is no way to describe the bone of contention, moreover not easy to figure indicates that 55% of Americans think President Obama is not elected for a second term, and only 58% Democrats think he will be elected again. And gave it changes frequently as its candidate for Republican Mitt Romney and it's not right to point the Speaker in the White House. However, Mitt Romney gets support is especially significant when there is no change to hear in order for President Obama. To remove any doubt on this point has been to treat a large number of surveys of two hunters barricade and then reach a conclusion. The central axis victory is achieved momentum and Mitt Romney is the first to enter the conflict confrontation underdog. - Until now he uses the best momentum to win the war he seemed knowledgeable, authoritative, and presidential. Since taking Obama appointed in January 2009 and economic and financial crisis after the collapse of the "Lehman Brothers" followed by other banks, corporations and concerns the U.S. has not yet recovered. Conventional wisdom among economists about the President, by and large he is not able to handle the economic problems of the United States, unemployment in the country Goa No End in Sight. majority of the public is still worried about the U.S. economy and the unemployment rate the highest in the country and the layout of the apartments that rises since the outbreak of the crisis, slow growth economy with 13 million citizens unemployed will not make anyone feel good about it. because of this Obama's victory not guaranteed upcoming elections for the U.S. presidency. commentators deal today after the recent conflict between the two candidates for president mainly calculations of the number of electors may different countries to give each of the contestants. This calculation determines, in the end. surveys reflect the mood and the choice of the public, hence the importance of countries swinging, especially those that provide many electors

Corruption in politics in Israel

Margins of the upcoming elections in Israel, "there is nothing new under the sun" intrigues are long time - these claims is generally accompanied fomenting contempt for the existing politics. What's interesting is sweeping claims against politics usually come from people that most of their work revolves around this theme, from this position, it is easy to laugh at the ignorance and limitations of politicians. There are not many good things to say about Israeli politics. Israeli politics is mainly engaged in concealing the reality. Still, there is something quite irritating politicians easy to love themselves: apparently they think they are more intelligent. I can not find a reason to be offended on behalf of politicians, because they know themselves well enough to be offended. But the pretense of throwing away other opinions is a bit condescending. With all the criticism of politicians, and not be drawn into anti-intellectualism, you can not take them one thing: they are people who come into contact with reality and not with the kingdom of ideas.Labor deal tiny politics, intrigue Labor Party is a party to smooth and deep roots in a long time. On the table is a proposal by one party primaries chairman of the kibbutzim district with district seats raises a storm and rage in the kibbutz movement, and arm has detached retirement threats to its historical relationship with the Labor Party for the upcoming elections to which were identified over the years - it is irresponsible to waste. They poses the personal self before the movement - all public undress completely and relentless subversion.MK Shelly Yachimovich now experiencing adjustment difficulties new career as party chairman, and they are not easy. As mentioned, the new career is a leading communications strategies - and drowning in a sea of ​​political intrigue that produce cobras former Labor Party and the present. There is concern that representatives of kibbutzim Knesset seats will be like Trojans have Independence Party's Ehud Barak - and attempted manipulation of him he may appeal the unity of the party, and perhaps even remove them from the party as did current term for Simhon and Orit Noked. Where the chairman seeks security when it is quoted: the list is good and attractive? Already have pre Results? Like in Mapai'' s gay? Still no list of candidates for the party primaries and already know how to be list. Whether she wants to stay as chairman of the political kitchen party, is to make slaughter, rather than just waitressing.
"Went another crow starling" Obviously the former Prime Minister, and has been adopted otherwise how could operate exploits, to be filed a reward "Society courage" What to do in this world everything is the opposite - ignoring the political rot affecting Israeli politics. Only by corrupt'' J. Silk Lessons will be learned, and maybe return justice and honesty and loyalty of these wayward politicians. Who failed during the Peace for Galilee, and managed to avoid the legal acrobatics and procrastination, as reflected in the charges against him should be that would think twice before he decides to return to the political fore to serve Redeemer and Savior. For him the highest bidder on his every word - not to assist snow whitened sins. If doubt was Biorstm place may not be the top leadership. Not join the community cohesive and piloted by media commentators, casual vested political interests, disguised interest "and sycophants" "awnings on the former prime minister and rejoicing following the acquittal dubious granting political bribery and reduce the conviction. Olmert's new image portrayed in the media almost identical wording from the press secretary in a totalitarian state. Achievements if any, are negligible compared to the political decay that has spread to the company during his tenure as prime minister.State of Israel and the parties have a major role especially since elections voters vote for parties - that is, lists of candidates whose composition is determined before the election. Expression of diverse opinions and promoting different interests. Serve democracy by providing an institutionalized expression of a variety of values, interests and opinions, and being part of your being pluralistic. Indeed, one of the major elements of her work and the establishment of a democracy in the State representing diverse audiences the company's complex and multi - faceted.Chairman of the Movement "has a future" headed by Yair Lapid promised new politics we do not known before. Recent past is quoted saying: I went on this trip because I am not willing to stand aside and let the State of Israel crumble. Old Israeli politics trying to undermine us into groups, and sectors and make us hate each other. We will not let that happen., and on another occasion he quoted: he opposes tycoons who build Las Vegas and then ask from institutional investors a haircut at the expense of "our pension." But now it is mandatory to publish the names of the candidates turns out to be true: anyone who talks about revolution, and the middle class representation and handling problems that plague it - is itself a suspicious object let alone when Jacob Perry as chairman of United Mizrahi Bank and other important key roles previously announced joining the party, "Perry Find Future, and Yair found money." He belongs Lauligrciit capital - government - we all wanted to think that will illuminate showing signs he just looking to break away from it. What message Yair Lapid public broadcasting? Is actually a satisfying old elite. Disappointment. Lapid talks about new politics, but brings us to the people that belong to the old politics, the people who run - outside or inside - the country's affairs for decades.

בטל עריכות

Grim reality

Alpha

News - reporting from New - York Times does not seem so out of touch, and should not be skeptical about the White House's called cargo hold - negotiations with Iran on its nuclear program - despite denials by the White House. And all this despite the "burden - and giving" with Iran did not start yesterday. The world knows that for ten years the Iranians had deceived the UN Security Council and the entire international system. However: do not fear the threat from Tehran American, and continue to raise the issue "ridiculous offers" burden - while providing unobstructed continue their nuclear path.Barack Obama has shown in recent years that a politician cool, sometimes too cold, who does what he thinks is good for him, Obama is not sure Slamrika better to attack Iran in the future. The recent statements of President Obama was quoted as saying: "act only according to American interests" is significant. Furthermore, according to the president's strategy, the country should not be the first to volunteer for global policing. The only pressure exerted on the President just brings it to act only according to what he feels is right for the American people. So he's going to block any pressure there, certainly if you choose a second term in the White House. Words of General Martin Dempsey - are things that represent the opinion of the President, and the final position for the U.S. attack Iran in the future to come.Way to show seriousness President Obama should ask for authority from Congress - that would give him the green light to send fighter jets to the nuclear installations to date this request was not discussed. Israel is preparing to attack because it does not believe the U.S. will prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons - "There is only one way to stop Iran from peaceful nuclear weapons - by putting" clear red line ", which is why the Prime Minister reported to the General Assembly a day after a speech Ahmding' Ed, drew a drawing of a bomb with a fuse to illustrate this world.If Obama is elected to a second term he will find none other than Jerusalem - Netanyahu. This signal means is an Israeli attack on Iran by 2013, the Israeli leadership to your new Likud Authority will not allow Obama another delay and procrastination on the subject, and Israel will decide on her own

Outrageous claims

Minister of Foreign Affairs of the European Union, "Catherine Ashton" audacity allows herself if universal hypocrisy in all its splendor say Israel's plan to build 800 housing units "Gilo" in Jerusalem are illegal under international law "automatic condemnations" indicate lack of fundamental understanding of reality area, in such slogans she thinks to win? "Gilo" is an integral part of Jerusalem, and Jerusalem is an integral part of Israel. Anyone who wants to contribute to reaching an agreement should focus on preventing acts anti - Israel of the Palestinians in the inter – national. A concern for human rights softness of the Foreign Minister of the European Union what is happening in Syria and Lebanon. Very puzzling at the Middle East on fire, tens of thousands of civilians killed in Syria, and the Lebanese capital explode car bombs, Iran continues to pursue nuclear weapons - it bothers the honorable minister is the construction in Gilo in Jerusalem. Posts like these make the union irrelevant - the denunciations were heard from the mouth of the Foreign Minister of the EU do not contribute anything to promote dialogue between Israel and the Palestinians, but only encourage the Palestinians continue to refuse to negotiate - and providing honest, when everything is on the table - and keep in anti - Israel "in the international arena." On the EU to focus on problems that arise between peoples and nations in Europe - not to interfere the internal matter of the State of Israel. And stop exploiting the international stage political interests. Incessant attacks of rockets and scrape the southern communities of Sderot and its environs and light anemic response of the EU and Ashton's impotence - which gives security of the Hamas and their offshoots continue on this path. Among other things, there seems no great enthusiasm by Europe activity actual, physical, as opposed to talking and international conferences. The Israeli government has the right, duty and unequivocal commitment to protect its citizens, the cities, children and assets.

Conducted extensive legal battle against Israel also open war on terror. This campaign, run by organizations other than Parliamentary various UN agencies and local courts, was known as' Law-Fare ', ie' Law War "nickname:" Palestine "is now used to describe a people, a country and a country belonging to Arab residents of Israel. However, this is new and most old as the State of Israel, if not less. Oslo Accords Damned: Israel pledged to transfer to the Palestinian Authority Judea and Samaria stages, including state lands where, but remember that everything is designed to create the conditions for its ripening of negotiations on final status is determined that the results of the final settlement will not be affected by anything in this Agreement, and the parties shall be deemed to have given up any of the rights or claims they are claiming. Regarding Governing Law Judea and Samaria is Jordanian law determines in part the land not belonging to any person or non-cultivated by people belonging to state ownership. Law and Director of the State of Israel have been applied in Greater Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. Jerusalem was reunited following the Six Day War, the IDF took control of East Jerusalem and handed it to control Jordanian to Israeli control. Shortly after the area was annexed to Israel by order of Minister in accordance with Article 11 of the Ordinance on Law and Administration. Areas of the territories are under Israeli control under the Six-Day War in 1967. The prevailing view is that, under international law, these territories are "occupied territories" and Israel may hold them subject to the rules of the Fourth Geneva Convention. At the end of 1967 accepted the UN decision relating to these areas, this is a UN Security Council resolution numbered 242. Decision no teeth for two reasons. Firstly - the decision is based on Chapter 6 of the UN Charter, which deals with peaceful conflict settlement. Therefore, there is no way to enforce this decision. Second, the decision applies only to recognized states were relevant to the conflict when making the decision, not the organizations. More should be noted that this decision does not state that there must be a retreat to the borders of June 4, 67, but only supports the principle of withdrawal of Israeli armed forces "from territories occupied in the recent conflict." And has made it clear that the drafters of the resolution, "Surfaces" and not "all territories". "Occupied territories": First've never taken a foreign sovereign, so it is not an occupation. Second: "67 lines" international agreements were armistice lines. It also states that they will never be considered as a political or political boundary. Moreover, international law says that Israel was established without an international border. The only international border that Israel is familiar with Jordan and Egypt, following the signing of a "peace treaty." Which means that the situation is six days of fighting breaking of a "peace", and IDF forces crossed the fence to the West - not broke a recognized border. Interest of the State of Israel: its basic territory undetermined war, but as a result of decisions of the Great Powers, " At the San - Remo, 1920, "to give Britain the government of the Land of Israel power of attorney which is included in the" Balfour Declaration. "According to the decision, the United Kingdom will be responsible for fulfilling the declaration in favor of the establishment of" a national home for the Jewish people - Israel. "Mandate also included Transjordan's been stolen from us and separated in 1922, when it became emirate of Transjordan "split later to Iraq and Jordan. yet Transjordan west - left setting mandatory as part of a national home for the Jewish people. In other words, the areas that" sheep "of Israel in the Six Day War are actually areas issued by the British during the implementation of its mandate., and legally removing these areas strengthens the national home of the Jewish people act the British government during the period of its mandate here was an arbitrary decision, not backed ratification of international institutions." The smell of the great hypocrisy "comes from the understanding that it is based decision 242. Many countries increased their well pickled by the occupation of other countries through war, the United States captured 40% of the territory of Mexico (1846), France annexed Alsace - Lorraine from Germany, during World War The first, and further expanded its borders at the expense of Italy, and more. Therefore: Decisions Conference San - Remo not impaired in establishing the United Nations. Vice versa. Validity expressly preserved under Article 80 of the UN Charter. Even the UN partition plan of 1947, did not affect this right. Both because it was rejected by the Arab world, basically leaving the war at the end of the British Mandate, and because the program was only a            recommendation, without any binding force. And hence the right of Jewish settlement ill "anchored by rules of international law.                                          

Is there a deed of settlement in the West Bank constitute a violation of the Geneva Convention? Clear that this claim is nothing. Geneva Convention applies only to areas designated as "occupied territories" under international law., And areas of Judea and Samaria is not like that. "Geneva Convention": applies only to the actions of one state in another state. Country - Israel Bank is an area of ​​another country, but part of the British Mandate still not delivered any country, so how can the Convention apply to the Jews that they have the right of settlement in those areas according to international law expressly protected in Article 80 of the UN Charter? I appreciate that the work did not end there will be difficulties in the way - Please note: thirty-five years the UN has become the Arab majority the ongoing farce decisions. And with all this grief, our right to examine the decisions, as tested decision that Zionism is racism. Most UN members were happy to wipe Israel. But that does not make the decision to trial "More and more correct.